The updated TVS Apache RR 310 has an edge over its rivals in pricing, but where does it stand in terms of performance and features.
TVS recently unveiled the updated Apache RR 310, offering lots of options and customisation starting at Rs 2.75 lakh. Here’s how it compares to its rivals.
TVS Apache RR 310 vs rivals: engine and performance
| Engine and performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVS Apache RR 310 | Kawasaki Ninja 300 | KTM RC 390 | BMW G 310 RR | |||
| Engine | 312cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled | 296cc, parallel twin, liquid cooled | 373cc, single cylinder, liquid cooled | 312cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled | ||
| Power | 38hp at 9,800rpm | 39hp at 11,000rpm | 43.5hp at 9,000rpm | 34hp at 9,700rpm | ||
| Torque | 29 Nm at 7,900rpm | 26.1 Nm at 10,000rpm | 37 Nm at 7,000rpm | 27.3 Nm at 7,700rpm | ||
| Gearbox | 6 speed | 6 speed | 6 speed | 6 speed | ||
The updated Apache RR 310 makes more power than its previous update and now produces 38hp compared to 34hp it made earlier. However, The KTM RC 390 leads this comparison with the largest engine and the highest power and torque figures. The Kawasaki Ninja 300 is the only motorcycle here with a parallel-twin engine and makes its power much higher up in the rev range in comparison. The TVS Apache RR 310 and BMW G 310 RR share the same 312cc engine, with the Apache producing more power (38hp vs. 34hp) and torque.
TVS Apache RR 310 vs rivals: weight and dimensions
| Weight and dimensions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVS Apache RR 310 | Kawasaki Ninja 300 | KTM RC 390 | BMW G 310 RR | |||
| Kerb weight | 174 kg | 179 kg | 172 kg | 174 kg | ||
| Seat height | 810mm | 780mm | 835mm | 811mm | ||
| Ground clearance | 180mm | 140mm | 153mm | 180mm | ||
| Fuel tank capacity | 11 liters | 17 liters | 13.7 liters | 11 liters | ||
| Wheelbase | 1365 mm | 1,405 mm | 1355mm | 1365 mm | ||
The TVS Apache RR 310 falls right in the middle when comparing its 174kg weight. This makes it lighter than the Kawasaki Ninja 300 at 179kg but heavier than the KTM RC 390. With a seat height of 810mm, the TVS Apache RR 310 isn’t the tallest of this bunch but also not as approachable as the Ninja 300. The Apache RR 310 has the smallest fuel tank along with the G 310 RR, while the Ninja 300 has the largest one by a considerable margin.
TVS Apache RR 310 vs rivals: suspension and brakes
| Suspension and brakes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVS Apache RR 310 | Kawasaki Ninja 300 | KTM RC 390 | BMW G 310 RR | ||
| Suspension (F/R) | USD fork, monoshock | Telescopic, Monoshock | USD fork, monoshock | USD fork, monoshock | |
| Brakes (F/R) | 300mm Disc, 240mm Disc | 290mm Disc, 220mm Disc | 320mm Disc, 230mm Disc | 300mm Disc, 240mm Disc | |
| Tyres (F/R) | 110/70-17 / 150/60-17 | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 | 110/70-17 / 150/60-17 | 110/70-17 / 150/60-17 | |
All bikes share a similar suspension setup except the Ninja 300 which uses a conventional telescopic fork instead of USD fork. KTM and the TVS are the only manufacturers which give compression and damping adjustability to the suspension setup in this comparison. While all motorcycles use a similar sized rear wheel in this comparison, Kawasaki’s Ninja 300 continues to use a 140 section rear wheel making it the odd ball in this comparison.
TVS Apache RR 310 vs rivals: price
| Price | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVS Apache RR 310 | Kawasaki Ninja 300 | KTM RC 390 | BMW G 310 RR | |
| Price | Rs 2.75 lakh- Rs 3.20 lakh | Rs 3.43 lakh | Rs 3.21 lakh | Rs 3.05 lakh- Rs 3.19 lakh |
In terms of pricing, the TVS Apache RR 310 is the most affordable starting price, ranging from Rs 2.75 lakh to Rs 3.20 lakh. Meanwhile, the BMW G 310 RR is priced slightly higher and falls short on features and performance. The KTM RC 390 is priced at Rs 3.21 lakh and stands as quite a performance bargain considering its price and credentials. The Kawasaki Ninja 300 is the most expensive at Rs 3.43 lakh. However, it is also the only motorcycle to offer a parallel-twin motor which many riders would prefer.
Also read: Triumph Speed 400 and Speed T4: similarities, differences
