THE TAKE: DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg, who was testifying at a trial in Washington to determine if Alphabet‘s Google broke US antitrust law, was meant to support the U.S. government’s argument that Google’s big pockets were used to illegally hold back its smaller rivals.
Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses
| Offering College | Course | Website |
|---|---|---|
| Northwestern University | Kellogg Post Graduate Certificate in Digital Marketing | Visit |
| Indian School of Business | ISB Professional Certificate in Digital Marketing | Visit |
| Indian School of Business | ISB Product Management | Visit |
| IIM Lucknow | IIML Executive Programme in Data Science | Visit |
KEY QUOTE:
Weinberg testified that he had pressed particular companies – he did not name them – to use DuckDuckGo as the default and found some interest but ultimately no success because of Google’s contracts with the companies.
“We generally saw a lot of interest,” he said. “We ultimately decided, this was after three years of trying this, that this was a quixotic exercise because of the contracts.”
CONTEXT:
Discover the stories of your interest
*The government has argued that Google, which has some 90% of the search market, illegally paid $10 billion annually to smartphone makers like Apple and wireless carriers like AT&T and others to be the default in search on their devices in order to stay on top. *The clout in search then makes Google a heavy hitter in the lucrative advertising market, boosting its profits.
*DuckDuckGo has around 2.5% of the online search engine market because it has not been able to win a default position on devices made by big companies.
